WRITING A CLASSIFICATION PAPER
Classification is sorting things into groups or categories on a single basis of division. A classification paper says something meaningful about how a whole relates to parts, or parts relate to a whole. Like skimming, scanning, paraphrasing, and summarizing, classification requires the ability to group related words, ideas, and characteristics.
Prewriting and purpose
It is a rare writer, student or otherwise, who can sit down and draft a classification essay without prewriting. A classification paper requires that you create categories, so prewriting for a classification paper involves grouping things in different ways in order to discover what categories make the most sense for the purpose you intend.
An important part of creating useful categories is seeing the different ways that things can be grouped. For example, a list of United States presidents may be grouped in any number of ways, depending on your purpose. They might be classified by political party, age on taking office, or previous occupations, but you could just as well, depending on your purpose, classify them by the pets they keep or how they keep physically fit. If your purpose was to analyze presidential administrations, you would group information focusing on the presidents' more public actions–say, cabinet appointments and judicial nominations. On the other hand, if you intended to write about the private lives of presidents, you might select information about personal relationships or hobbies.
Make sure the categories you create have a single basis of classification and that the group fits the categories you propose. You may not, for example, write about twentieth century presidents on the basis of the kinds of pets they kept if some of those presidents did not keep pets. The group does not fit the category. If you intend to talk about all the presidents, you must reinvent the categories so that all the presidents fit into it. In the example below, the group is "all U.S. presidents" and the two categories are "those who kept pets and those who did not":
Some U.S. presidents have indulged their love of pets, keeping menageries of animals around the White House, and others have preferred the White House pet-free.
Alternatively, in the following example, the group is "twentieth century U.S. presidential pet-keepers" and the three categories are "dog lovers, cat lovers, and exotic fish enthusiasts."
Among the twentieth century presidents who kept pets, presidential pet-keepers can be classified as dog-lovers, cat-lovers, or exotic fish enthusiasts (for who can really love a fish?).
Developing a thesis
Once you have decided on your group, purpose, and categories, develop a thesis statement that does the following three things:
- names what group of people or things you intend to classify
- describes the basis of the classification
- labels the categories you have developed
Here is a thesis statement for a classification paper written for a Health and Human Fitness class that includes all three of the above elements, underlined:
Our last five U.S. presidents have practiced physical fitness regimens that varied from the very formal to the informal. They have been either regular private gym-goers, disciplined public joggers, or casual active sports enthusiasts.
Order is the way you arrange ideas to show how they relate to one another. For example, it is common to arrange facts and discussion points from most- to least-important or from least- to most-important, or from oldest to most recent or longest to shortest. The example thesis statement above is ordered from most- to least-formal physical fitness activities. There is no one right way; use an ordering system that seems best to suit your purpose and the type of information you are working with.
For example, suppose you are writing about the last five U.S. presidents for a psychology class. If you wish to show that these presidents' public decisions spring directly from negative issues in their personal relationships, you might order your information from most private to more public actions to clearly establish this connection. Or, if you wish to give the reader the impression that he is moving into increasingly intimate knowledge of personal presidential foibles, you may choose the reverse, ordering your information from public to private.
Signal phrases, or transitions, typically used for classification papers include the following:
- this type of...
- several kinds of...
- in this category...
- can be divided into...
- classified according to...
- is categorized by...
These phrases signal to the reader your intention to divide and sort things. They also contribute to the unity of the paper.
Classification requires that you invent (or discover) abstract categories, impose them on a concrete whole, and derive something new-a tall order that you can, nevertheless, manage if you resist the temptation to skip the brainstorming steps. Remember that clinical dissection is never an aim in itself; the point of classification is to reveal and communicate something meaningful.
1. Pitts SR, Niska RW, Xu J, Burt CW. National hospital ambulatory medical care survey: 2006 Emergency department summary. National Health Care Statistics. 2008;6(7):1–40.[PubMed]
2. Hollander JE, Singer AJ, Valentine SM, Shofer FS. Risk factors for infection in patients with traumatic lacerations. Acad Emerg Med. 2001;8(7):716–720. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2001.tb00190.x.[PubMed][Cross Ref]
3. Singer AJ, Dagum AB. Current management of acute cutaneous wounds. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(10):1037–1046. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0707253.[PubMed][Cross Ref]
4. Barbul A, et al. Wound healing. In: Brunicardi FC, Andersen DK, Billiar TR, et al., editors. Schwartz’s principles of surgery. Eighth. Columbus: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc; 2005. pp. 165–182.
5. Woo K, Ayello EA, Sibbald RG. The edge effect: current therapeutic options to advance the wound edge. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2007;20(2):99–117. doi: 10.1097/00129334-200702000-00009.[PubMed][Cross Ref]
6. Percival NJ. Classification of wounds and their management. Surgery. 2002;20(5):114–117.
7. Berk WA, Welch RD, Bock BF. Controversial issues in clinical management of the simple wound. Ann Emerg Med. 1992;21(1):72–80. doi: 10.1016/S0196-0644(05)82245-0.[PubMed][Cross Ref]
8. Chisholm CD. Wound evaluation and cleansing. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 1992;10(4):665–672.[PubMed]
9. Lammers RL, Hudson DL, Seaman ME. Prediction of traumatic wound infection with a neural network-derived decision model. Am J Emerg Med. 2003;21(1):1–7. doi: 10.1053/ajem.2003.50026.[PubMed][Cross Ref]
10. Frank M, Schmucker U, Hinz P, Zach A, Ekkernkamp A, Matthes G. Not another 4th of July report: uncommon blast injuries to the hand. Emerg Med J. 2008;25(2):93–97. doi: 10.1136/emj.2007.052316.[PubMed][Cross Ref]
11. Zempsky WT, Cravero JP. Relief of pain and anxiety in pediatric patients in emergency medical systems. Pediatrics. 2004;114(5):1348–1356. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1752.[PubMed][Cross Ref]
12. Bonadio WA. Safe and effective method for application of tetracaine, adrenaline, and cocaine to oral lacerations. Ann Emerg Med. 1996;28(4):396–398. doi: 10.1016/S0196-0644(96)70003-3.[PubMed][Cross Ref]
13. Ernst AA, Marvez-Valls E, Nick TG, Mills T, Minvielle L, Houry D. Topical lidocaine adrenaline tetracaine (LAT gel) versus injectable buffered lidocaine for local anesthesia in laceration repair. West J Med. 1997;167(2):79–81.[PMC free article][PubMed]
14. Railan D, Alster TS. Use of topical lidocaine for cosmetic dermatologic procedures. J Drugs Dermatol. 2007;6(11):1104–1108.[PubMed]
15. Kundu S, Achar S. Principles of office anesthesia: part II. Topical anesthesia. Am Fam Physician. 2002;66(1):99–102.[PubMed]
16. Scarfone RJ, Jasani M, Gracely EJ. Pain of local anesthetics: Rate of administration and buffering. Ann Emerg Med. 1998;31(1):36–40. doi: 10.1016/S0196-0644(98)70278-1.[PubMed][Cross Ref]
17. Brogan GX, Singer AJ, Valentine SM, et al. Comparison of wound infection rates using plain versus buffered lidocaine for anesthesia of traumatic wounds. Am J Emerg Med. 1997;15:25–28. doi: 10.1016/S0735-6757(97)90042-5.[PubMed][Cross Ref]
18. Thyssen JP, Menné T, Elberling J, Plaschke P, Johansen JD. Hypersensitivity to local anaesthetics–update and proposal of evaluation algorithm. Contact Dermat. 2008;59(2):69–78. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2008.01366.x.[PubMed][Cross Ref]
19. Daya MR, Burton BT, Schleiss MR, DiLiberti JH. Recurrent seizures following mucosal application of TAC. Ann Emerg Med. 1988;17(6):646–648. doi: 10.1016/S0196-0644(88)80409-8.[PubMed][Cross Ref]
20. Dailey RH. Fatality secondary to misuse of TAC solution. Ann Emerg Med. 1988;17(2):159–160. doi: 10.1016/S0196-0644(88)80303-2.[PubMed][Cross Ref]
21. Howell JM, Chisholm CD. Outpatient wound preparation and care: a national survey. Ann Emerg Med. 1992;21(8):976–981. doi: 10.1016/S0196-0644(05)82938-5.[PubMed][Cross Ref]
22. Pfaff JA, Moore GP. Reducing risk in emergency department wound management. Emerg Med Clin N Am. 2007;25:189–201. doi: 10.1016/j.emc.2007.01.009.[PubMed][Cross Ref]
23. Singer AJ, Hollander JE, Subramanian S, Malhotra AK, Villez PA. Pressure dynamics of various irrigation techniques commonly used in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 1994;24(1):36–40. doi: 10.1016/S0196-0644(94)70159-8.[PubMed][Cross Ref]
24. Longmire AW, Broom LA, Burch J. Wound infection following high-pressure syringe and needle irrigation. Am J Emerg Med. 1987;5(2):179–81. doi: 10.1016/0735-6757(87)90121-5.[PubMed][Cross Ref]
25. Rodeheaver GT, Ratliff . Wound cleansing, wound irrigation, wound disinfection. In: Krasner D, Rodeheaver G, Sibbald RG, editors. Chronic wound care, Chapter 34. Malvern: HMP Communications; 2008.
26. Chisholm CD, Cordell WH, Rogers K, Woods JR. Comparison of a new pressurized saline canister versus syringe irrigation for laceration cleansing in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 1992;21(11):1364–1367. doi: 10.1016/S0196-0644(05)81903-1.[PubMed][Cross Ref]
27. Grotz MR, Allami MK, Harwood P, Pape HC, Krettek C, Giannoudis PV. Open pelvic fractures: epidemiology, current concepts of management and outcome. Injury. 2005;36(1):1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2004.05.029.[PubMed][Cross Ref]
28. Fernandez R, Griffiths R. Water for wound cleansing. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;23(1):CD003861.[PubMed]
29. Khan MN, Naqvi AH. Antiseptics, iodine, povidone iodine and traumatic wound cleansing. J Tissue Viability. 2006;16(4):6–10.[PubMed]
30. Watt BE, Proudfoot AT, Vale JA. Hydrogen peroxide poisoning. Toxicol Rev. 2004;23(1):51–57. doi: 10.2165/00139709-200423010-00006.[PubMed][Cross Ref]
31. Cartotto RC, Peters WJ, Neligan PC, Douglas LG, Beeston J. Chemical burns. Can J Surg. 1996;39(3):205–211.[PMC free article][PubMed]
32. Lee CK, Hansen SL. Management of acute wounds. Clin Plast Surg. 2007;34:685–696. doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2007.08.011.[PubMed][Cross Ref]
33. Tetanus and tetanus toxoid: epidemiology and prevention of vaccine-preventable diseases. National Immunization Program Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Center for Disease Control Web site. As found at: http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vpd-vac/tetanus/default.htm#top accessed on 2/25/2009.
34. Eron LJ. Targeting lurking pathogens in acute traumatic and chronic wounds. J Emerg Med. 1999;17(1):189–195. doi: 10.1016/S0736-4679(98)00149-8.[PubMed][Cross Ref]
35. Hankin A, Everett WW. Are antibiotics necessary after incision and drainage of a cutaneous abscess? Ann Emerg Med. 2007;50(1):49–51. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.01.018.[PubMed][Cross Ref]
36. Edlich RF, Rodeheaver GT, Morgan RF, et al. Principles of emergency wound management. Ann Emerg Med. 1988;17:1284–1302. doi: 10.1016/S0196-0644(88)80354-8.[PubMed][Cross Ref]
37. Ichikawa S, Ishihara M, Okazaki T, et al. Prospective study of antibiotic protocols for managing surgical site infections in children. J Pediatr Surg. 2007;42(6):1002–1007. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2007.01.034.[PubMed][Cross Ref]
38. Farion KJ, Osmond MH, Hartling L, et al. Tissue adhesives for traumatic lacerations: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Acad Emerg Med. 2003;10(2):110–118. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2003.tb00027.x.[PubMed][Cross Ref]
39. Lloyd JD, Marque MJ, Kacprowicz RF. Closure Techniques. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2007;25(1):73–81. doi: 10.1016/j.emc.2007.01.002.[PubMed][Cross Ref]
40. Fonder MA, Mamelak AJ, Lazarus GS, Chanmugam A. Occlusive wound dressings in emergency medicine and acute care. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2007;25(1):235–242. doi: 10.1016/j.emc.2007.01.012.[PubMed][Cross Ref]
41. Davidson JM, Breyer MD. Inflammatory modulation and wound repair. J Invest Dermatol. 2003;120(5):xi–xii. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1747.2003.12154.x.[PubMed][Cross Ref]
42. Sibbald RG, Orsted H, Schultz GS, Coutts P, Keast D. International Wound Bed Preparation Advisory Board, Canadian Chronic Wound Advisory Board. Preparing the wound bed 2003: focus on infection and inflammation. Ostomy/Wound Manage. 2003;49(11):23–51.[PubMed]
43. Sibbald RG, Orsted HL, Coutts PM, Keast DL. Best practice recommendations for preparing the wound bed: update 2006. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2007;20:390–405. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000280200.65883.fd.[PubMed][Cross Ref]
44. Sibbald RG, Williamson D, Orsted HL, et al. Preparing the wound bed: debridement, bacterial balance and moisture balance. Ostomy/Wound Manage. 2000;46(11):14–35.[PubMed]
45. Stone S, Carter WA. Wound preparation. In: Tintinalli JE, Kelen GD, Stapczynski JS, Ma OJ, Clin DM, editors. Tintinalli’s emergency medicine. New York: The McGram-Hill Companies, Inc; 2004. pp. 284–287.